 | | | | | |
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 10:19:41PM +0000, Todd Lehman wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney writes:
> > If I had my say, I like the idea of a mailing list on LDraw.org, which
> > posts messages automatically to a LUGNET group for convenience. Perhaps
> > similar to how lugnet.robotics is set up, but where only specific people
> > have posting privileges?
>
> Aha -- yes, that would work too -- and is extremely easy to set up.
>
> In fact, if you wanted to make it read-only on LUGNET (so that the only way
> to post is via the mailing list on ldraw.org), all we need to do is subscribe
> an address <something@lugnet.com> to the <ldraw-tech@ldraw.org> mailing list.
we can easily also tell mailman to post each email to the mailing list
to a group on the NNTP server.
Dan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger writes:
> > In fact, if you wanted to make it read-only on LUGNET (so that the only way
> > to post is via the mailing list on ldraw.org), all we need to do is subscribe
> > an address <something@lugnet.com> to the <ldraw-tech@ldraw.org> mailing list.
>
> we can easily also tell mailman to post each email to the mailing list
> to a group on the NNTP server.
Cool. Hmm, which to choose... It makes less work for me doing it the
mailing list way, because of the incoming gateway translations at the
e-mail level. What do we want to call it here? lugnet.cad.ldraw-tech?
lugnet.cad.ldraw.tech?
--Todd
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger writes:
> > > In fact, if you wanted to make it read-only on LUGNET (so that the only way
> > > to post is via the mailing list on ldraw.org), all we need to do is subscribe
> > > an address <something@lugnet.com> to the <ldraw-tech@ldraw.org> mailing list.
> >
> > we can easily also tell mailman to post each email to the mailing list
> > to a group on the NNTP server.
>
> Cool. Hmm, which to choose... It makes less work for me doing it the
> mailing list way, because of the incoming gateway translations at the
> e-mail level. What do we want to call it here? lugnet.cad.ldraw-tech?
> lugnet.cad.ldraw.tech?
>
> --Todd
I think lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw.tech is long but it fits in with the
existing scheme
-Orion
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Orion Pobursky writes:
> I think lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw.tech is long but it fits in with the
> existing scheme
Oh, that's a good point. Yes, it's a bit long, but as Steve points out,
it's a relatively low-interest group. Putting it as .ldraw.tech instead
of .ldraw-tech also makes it cleaner if other lists (such as, say, Tim's
ldraw-siggraph list) wanted to be mirrored here as well.
--Todd
| | | | | | |
