Subject:
|
Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:39:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4950 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Niels Karsdorp wrote:
(I've > read that there's a major update on classic windows in the pipeline.)
> Niels
Yes, see http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptreviewsummary.cgi?f=classicwindows. This
shows how I decided to organise these files a while back. The CA header
conversion is nearing completion so I expect the update mechanism to be back on
track before the end of the year (2007). I would like to get these into one of
the next two or three updates.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
| (...) That's why I want to know for sure what to do for new authored parts. (I can't always look how existing parts were done, as these may not be conform to current rules, like you said.) (...) Many windows have just a simple rectangular glass (...) (20 years ago, 31-Aug-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
