 | | | | | |
I have checked LEGO Universe Team parts (http://www.ldraw.org/Article490.html)
against official or non-official parts when they exist, and noticed several
differences.
Could anyone who own some of these parts (I don't) check these differences and
comment? (LUT version may not match real parts, see
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Philo/Misc/55615.jpg)
- 3278: Official part (70) is quite different, but... seems to better match
images of real part!
- 3496: Some differences with official 69
- 41883: part on PT is 2 ldu higher than LUT version
- 42448: Part on tracker (x230) is 5 ldu taller than LUT version
- 60219: this part seem identical to 30283 but there are 3 holes between studs
in the middle. In which set does 60219 appear?
Thanks in advance,
Philo
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
| |
I have checked LEGO Universe Team parts
(http://www.ldraw.org/Article490.html)
• against official or non-official
parts when they exist, and noticed several
• differences.
Could anyone who own some of these parts (I don’t) check these differences
and
• comment? (LUT version may not match real parts, see
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Philo/Misc/55615.jpg)
•
- 42448: Part on tracker (x230) is 5 ldu taller than LUT version
|
I measured the real part and confirm that the LUT-part is correct! Matching
the
PT-Version (Trans-White) with the LUT-Version (Black) you’ll also see that the
middle bar of
the PT-part is 2 LDU higher:
The top of the middle bar of the L(EGO)Draw part is 86 LDU which is the
actual
height of my real part. I suggest a mix of the two parts with taking
the
42448.dat on the PT as base (after the middle bar’s height has been
corrected)
and then merging it with the top of the LUT part, which has smooth
curves. I
would just substitute some primitives at the very top of the vertical bars:
Draw_42448.png)
w.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
> I have checked LEGO Universe Team parts (http://www.ldraw.org/Article490.html)
> against official or non-official parts when they exist, and noticed several
> differences.
> Could anyone who own some of these parts (I don't) check these differences and
> comment? (LUT version may not match real parts, see
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Philo/Misc/55615.jpg)
>
> - 3278: Official part (70) is quite different, but... seems to better match
> images of real part!
> - 3496: Some differences with official 69
> - 41883: part on PT is 2 ldu higher than LUT version
> - 42448: Part on tracker (x230) is 5 ldu taller than LUT version
> - 60219: this part seem identical to 30283 but there are 3 holes between studs
> in the middle. In which set does 60219 appear?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Philo
hi folks,
we still seek some input on the parts above. if you have the real version of
those please measure/compare and let us know.
w.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
> I have checked LEGO Universe Team parts (http://www.ldraw.org/Article490.html)
> against official or non-official parts when they exist, and noticed several
> differences.
> Could anyone who own some of these parts (I don't) check these differences and
> comment? (LUT version may not match real parts, see
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Philo/Misc/55615.jpg)
>
> - 3278: Official part (70) is quite different, but... seems to better match
> images of real part!
> - 3496: Some differences with official 69
> - 41883: part on PT is 2 ldu higher than LUT version
> - 42448: Part on tracker (x230) is 5 ldu taller than LUT version
> - 60219: this part seem identical to 30283 but there are 3 holes between studs
> in the middle. In which set does 60219 appear?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Philo
sorry for insisting on this but we still have no answers. if you have this parts
please measure!
w.
| | | | | | |
