Subject:
|
Re: 3471 Plant Tree Pine
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Sep 1999 15:08:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
626 times
|
| |
|
|
That's 3471 plus the smaller one (2435). The only tree that could be
considered
a larger "pine" than 3471 is the cypress.
The cypress would be a lot more work than 3471. I haven't compared them
directly
in awhile, but I believe 2435 might be the same as the top of 3471 with
a base on
the bottom.
BTW, I appreciate how you backed up your argument with solid evidence,
rather than
insisting on your point for the sake of arguing. Now we know exactly
what you
were talking about. I wish you'd quoted specifically the portion of my
message that
you were addressing, but that's minor in this particular case.
-- joshua
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
>
> In the instructions of 6054 the last step clearly shows 2 pine trees of different sizes.
> the large one clearly has 3 extra rings on it.
>
> --
> Jonathan Wilson
> wilsonj@xoommail.com
> http://members.xoom.com/wilsonj/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 3471 Plant Tree Pine
|
| I thought that 3471 was the larger of the two conical pine trees, but without a DAT viewer on my office machine couldn't be sure. From the time when I considered authoring this, then I do recollect that the foliage part of 2435 is identical to the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 3471 Plant Tree Pine
|
| In the instructions of 6054 the last step clearly shows 2 pine trees of different sizes. the large one clearly has 3 extra rings on it. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 10-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
