Subject:
|
Re: The future of LDraw?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:44:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
20223 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Timothy Gould wrote:
> --snip--
>
> > Yes, maybe it is a generation issue. I followed the link
> > http://www.brothers-brick.com/2010/03/14/the-future-of-ldraw/ and I didn't like
> > what I saw. I mean, most of the replies were in deed positive and encouraging,
> > but the layout of the site... No tree structure but just a linear thread.
> > Scroll, scroll, scroll down to the latest post. Next time I visit that
> > discussion, I have no clue on where the last read post is. It feels like if this
> > is the future, then we're moving backwards into it. :)
> >
> > But then again, Jesus once said the you cannot pour new wine into old bags so it
> > must be that same old well-known generation issue...
> >
> > /Tore
>
> That structure attracted 6.2 thousand comments last year out of 8.4 million page
> views. You may not like it (I prefer threading too) but it's here to stay.
>
> And between TBB and flickr (same structure) there are already over 40 comments
> about this issue. Contrast to here and you see where the future lies.
>
> Tim
I think TBB and flickR have an easier entry. LUGNET is a bit scary to sign up
to, and is certainly a pain in the but to remember your username (member #) and
password (is this even changeable). Actually, I remember it being a lot scary
to join.
The tree structure and searchability make LUGNET worth it. That, and the wealth
of knowledge contained in its history and active users.
Also, how would someone discover LUGNET? I certainly didn't ever put LEGO User
Group into any search engine. However, the main reason I joined wasn't for the
conversations about rotation matrices or any other LDraw this or that, but so I
could show off my MOCs for discussion. The other websites certainly have the
market on MOC discussion.
All of that said, without having joined LUGNET (and recording my username and
password), I would never have been involved with LDraw.
Scott W.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) I very strongly second this. I've been lurking here for years now, but almost never post, and never get involved, because of how awkward, old & user-unfriendly LUGNET is. I think LUGNET is a huge deterrent to any potential LDraw newcomers & (...) (14 years ago, 16-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| --snip-- (...) That structure attracted 6.2 thousand comments last year out of 8.4 million page views. You may not like it (I prefer threading too) but it's here to stay. And between TBB and flickr (same structure) there are already over 40 comments (...) (14 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
