Subject:
|
Re: Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:05:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
15160 times
|
| |
|
|
> I'd like to suggest:
> 3651.dat Technic Connector Peghole to Bush with 2 Studs
> 32039.dat Technic Connector Axlehole to Axlehole
> 6553.dat Technic Connector Axlehole to Axle
> 32013.dat Technic Connector Peghole to Axlehole #1
> 32034.dat Technic Connector Peghole to Axleholes #2 (180 degree)
> 32016.dat Technic Connector Peghole to Axleholes #3 (157.5 degree)
> 32192.dat Technic Connector Peghole to Axleholes #4 (135 degree)
> 32015.dat Technic Connector Peghole to Axleholes #5 (112.5 degree)
> 32014.dat Technic Connector Peghole to Axleholes #6 (90 degree)
I am mostly OK with your suggestion. The only slightly illogical point is that
the bush of 3651 and the Axlehole of 32039 are not so different, so why not name
them the same?
Otherwise, the other drawback of these names (especially angle connectors) is
that they are fairly long, requiring a large screen estate to see them in full.
Fortunately yellow bubbles do help!
May I suggest also, for parts that were named differently for so long, to add
significant parts of their old names in keywords? (Angle, Pole Reverser
Handle...)
Philo
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
|
| In (URL) Philo wrote "Speaking of rationalization, I would be very happy if we could find a coherent naming scheme for parts 3651, 32039, 6553 (and 32013?) - I can't possibly remember 6553 name...". So here is a first suggestion: Currently we have: (...) (14 years ago, 26-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
