|
|
| |
In lugnet.build.schleim, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
Deeplinks, Brother John, Deeplinks!
|
Gahh! Well, they have been moderated now. Enjoy.
JOHN
|
|
| |
In lugnet.build.schleim, John Neal wrote:
Deeplinks, Brother John, Deeplinks!
|
|
| |
In lugnet.announce.moc, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
Click pic for the answer...
ROSCO
|
Awesome, Rosco! When I clicked, I didn’t expect it to be able to be tuned to
pitch!
Well played;-)
JOHN
|
|
| |
In lugnet.announce.moc, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
Click pic for the answer...
ROSCO
|
This is cool, but you already know that, since I already told you how awesome it
is. Of course, the only thing that would make it cooler was if it was going to
be displayed at Brickfete.
Janey “Yes, I used Rosco for a shameless plug, Red Brick”
Ok, more seriously, its an impressive build, has nice lines, and sounds pretty
good as well. No more cranes and bridges for you.
|
|
| |
Click pic for the answer...
ROSCO
|
|
| |
In lugnet.build.schleim, Didier Enjary wrote:
| |
The news has already been commented in many places - the LEGO board games to
come (2009-2010) are bringing to us some new parts.
Among them, a 2x2 plate with one - centered - stud. Some will call it the
super jumper plate. I prefer the german acronym AVMEP, coined on the former
AZMEP (jumper plate). The “Z” (Zwei - Two) is replaced by the “V” (Vier -
Four)
|
snip>
| |
So, do you like AVMEP part and AVMEP buildings?
|
I have been thinking for a long time about half-stud offsets in two directions
going around corners of buildings so as to quoin the bricks. Perhaps this piece
could facilitate that.
|
|
| |
The news has already been commented in many places - the LEGO board games to
come (2009-2010) are bringing to us some new parts.
Among them, a 2x2 plate with one - centered - stud. Some will call it the super
jumper plate. I prefer the german acronym AVMEP, coined on the former AZMEP
(jumper plate). The “Z” (Zwei - Two) is replaced by the “V” (Vier - Four)
I see three simples AVMEP buildings
- stacking a jumper plate onto two others - an obvious build but two plates thick,
- place a 1x1 round plate between four studs - it saves parts, is one plate thick but that’s not so easy to stack a round plate this way,
- and the last one is based on the now famous NUT
So, do you like AVMEP part and AVMEP buildings?
|
|
| |
In lugnet.build.schleim, Didier Enjary wrote:
| |
- less clutch power for immediate disassembling
- limited jumper plate colour availability for increased building challenge
|
Which contradicts your claim of uselessness for the following reasons:
- less clutch power is sometimes desirable - I have used this exact construction in a GBC module to allow easy removal of a part for maintenance. The clutch is even less than a regular stud in a regular hole - that is, barely any.
- There are colours in which the jumper tile exists, but not the 1x2 plate (exercice left to the reader to find them; one is as recent as 2009)
So there, this is actually useful!
| |
To conclude I encourage you to share your favorite NUTs (New Useless
Technique) in reply to this post
|
Well, it may not qualify as useless either, but I’ve contemplated using 1x2
hinge bricks in a fixed, studs-up position, instead of regular 1x2 bricks. The
reason is simple: to have a smooth-looking brick, with hollow studs on top; as
you said sometimes you need that (although now you mention it, the 1x1 brick
with hole would work just as good)
|
|
|
