Subject:
|
The NUT of the day : One Stud Offset
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.schleim
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:54:27 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
!!
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
23056 times
|
| |
|
|
ABT (Advanced Building Techniques) are widely used. Everyone knows for instance
the use of a jumper plate to achieve a half stud offset (AZMEP)
Another one consist in stacking 1xn parts on hollow stud in a tube to hollow
stud connection.
The jumper plate IS a hollow stud part. What if we combine these two techniques?
You achieve an incredible one-stud offsetand get great advantages :
- only two plates thick,
- less clutch power for immediate disassembling
- limited jumper plate colour availability for increased building challenge
and the most amazing is that this technique has
- No SNOT side effects.
To conclude I encourage you to share your favorite NUTs (New Useless Technique)
in reply to this post
Schleim well,
Didier
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: The NUT of the day : One Stud Offset
|
| (...) All humor aside, this is actually a useful technique...in one specific instance (well, probably two, now). When you put a grille tile down on a regular plate, the studs fill in the gaps nearly completely. When you put a grille tile down on a (...) (15 years ago, 1-Jul-09, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
| | | Re: The NUT of the day : One Stud Offset
|
| (...) Which contradicts your claim of uselessness for the following reasons: less clutch power is sometimes desirable - I have used this exact construction in a GBC module to allow easy removal of a part for maintenance. The clutch is even less than (...) (15 years ago, 1-Jul-09, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
