Subject:
|
Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Apr 2000 18:33:20 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2140 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Dan Boger writes:
> > 9. What other areas (besides news articles) can you imagine that a
> > collaborative ratings system would be most helpful to you? LEGO sets?
> > Websites? Individual web pages? etc...
>
> don't we already have that for web pages, at least in some form, in the
> CSotW?
In some form, yes, but it's greatly lacking in that it has no way of learning
your personal preferences. Already there are 180 CLSotW past picks, and just
to go through all of them (even on a T1 or a T3) would probably take someone
several days.
I believe there are also hundreds of sites out there which escape notice
too easily. I just took a thorough look at Tom Stangl's website today, for
example, and I was totally blown away by it. I'm not sure if I'd ever seen
the whole thing before -- only bits & pieces of it. I wish I could rate it
very highly somewhere as a recommendation for people to check it out. I
could post a message about it, but that's so transient -- not persistent
enough.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
