Subject:
|
Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Apr 2000 18:39:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2126 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In some form, yes, but it's greatly lacking in that it has no way of learning
> your personal preferences. Already there are 180 CLSotW past picks, and just
> to go through all of them (even on a T1 or a T3) would probably take someone
> several days.
>
> I believe there are also hundreds of sites out there which escape notice
> too easily. I just took a thorough look at Tom Stangl's website today, for
> example, and I was totally blown away by it. I'm not sure if I'd ever seen
> the whole thing before -- only bits & pieces of it. I wish I could rate it
> very highly somewhere as a recommendation for people to check it out. I
> could post a message about it, but that's so transient -- not persistent
> enough.
so something like /lugnet/publish/sites or /lugnet/announce/site where you (or
someone) can post a site, has to set a FUT to someplace else... perhaps
instead of the regular message post form, you do it with a special form that
will ask for Author name, email and description?
feh, I had some other ideas for it, but this blinding headache is confusing
me... :/
More on this later.
Dan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
