Subject:
|
Re: New feature: Article rating
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 26 Mar 2000 23:42:55 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1801 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000 18:23:11 GMT, Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes:
> > Still don't like it. And what's to prevent people from memorizing that
> > password and using it on other systems? [...]
>
> Excellent point. Thanks. You've just demonstrated that a machine generated
> password does absolutely nothing to ensure (as in 100%) that a password is
> actually unique to a particular system. It makes it more probable, but doesn't
> unconditionally guarantee it.
>
> (A side chuckle: In some future world where retinal scans are commonplace,
> you're kinda limited there to two passwords. :-)
>
> --Todd
That future world may not be as far off as you might think. I have a friend
that works for a company that is working on inexpensive retina scanners for NT
logon among other things.
Rob
-
Rob Farver - mailto:rfarver@rcn.com
http://www.farver.com/lego/
http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/rfarver
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New feature: Article rating
|
| (...) Excellent point. Thanks. You've just demonstrated that a machine generated password does absolutely nothing to ensure (as in 100%) that a password is actually unique to a particular system. It makes it more probable, but doesn't (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
