To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Year / *1833 (-5)
  Re: New 2004 set photos
 
(...) The buckets stack so I don't see why the tubs wouldn't. There should be a dent in the bottom of the tub that accepts the studs. Having said that, when the buckets are empty they don't "nestle" as well as the tubs, expecially the lids but the (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.year.2004)
 
  Re: New 2004 set photos
 
(...) Why wouldn't it be stackable? (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.year.2004)
 
  Re: New 2004 set photos
 
(...) Oh My Goodness! That's adorable! I want a few of these! Seriously, that's the cutest LEGO bucket I've ever seen! Dave K (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.year.2004)
 
  Re: New 2004 set photos
 
There's a new tub: (URL) piece count yet, but I hate the new tub design, much less useful for storage - how are you supposed to stack them? <mutter> Kevin---...--- Farmhouse kit: (URL) TOWN PLANNING information: (URL) Lego parts store: (URL) Guild (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.year.2004)
 
  Re: New 2004 set photos
 
And check out the new bulk tub: (URL) is similar to the "2x2 stud" buckets we have now. But instead it is a 2x3 stud tub! Bryan "Ka-On Lee" <ko_lee@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HsMAw8.17rw@lugnet.com... (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.year.2004)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR