 | | Re: So it's finally 2002..
|
|
(...) Come to New York and see 2001 in Times Square. Unless it ended its run last night, a restored edition was playing in one theatre. I think it's across the street from McDonald's. They're watching and waiting. (23 years ago, 1-Jan-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: So it's finally 2002..
|
|
"Greg Majewski" <citrusx__@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Gp9MHs.GIz@lugnet.com... (...) Well considering that by 2001 we couldn't pull off a cool centrifugal space station, a moon base or a manned flight to Jupiter, (even a decent re-release of (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | So it's finally 2002..
|
|
When's NASA going to launch a mission to the Ice Planet? (23 years ago, 1-Jan-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | This years releases
|
|
Hey there :) It's January 1st 2005, and I have the opportunity to go back in time to 2002 and buy LEGO, I wonder what sets I should buy to bring back? What is most sought after? I am thinking Life On Mars just because it had a short product run, or (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-02, to lugnet.year.2005)
|
| |
| | Re: racers set 4593 come with wrong rear wheels
|
|
"Henry Durand" <e.durand@verizon.net> wrote in message news:Gp8DuD.ACt@lugnet.com... (...) fitting (...) It (...) wheel (...) (also (...) the (...) is (...) is. My (...) wheels. I (...) Mine did as well and the replacements I received from LEGO (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
