|
|
 | | Re: New 2004 set photos
|
| (...) (see 4853-4860) Maybe I'm just barking up the wrong tree here ... -s (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.year.2004)
| | | | | Re: New 2004 set photos
|
| (...) The buckets stack so I don't see why the tubs wouldn't. There should be a dent in the bottom of the tub that accepts the studs. Having said that, when the buckets are empty they don't "nestle" as well as the tubs, expecially the lids but the (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.year.2004)
| | | | | Re: New 2004 set photos
|
| (...) Why wouldn't it be stackable? (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.year.2004)
| | | | | Re: New 2004 set photos
|
| (...) Oh My Goodness! That's adorable! I want a few of these! Seriously, that's the cutest LEGO bucket I've ever seen! Dave K (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.year.2004)
| | | | | Re: New 2004 set photos
|
| There's a new tub: (URL) piece count yet, but I hate the new tub design, much less useful for storage - how are you supposed to stack them? <mutter> Kevin---...--- Farmhouse kit: (URL) TOWN PLANNING information: (URL) Lego parts store: (URL) Guild (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.year.2004)
|
|
