 | | Re: The Toy Book's report on LEGO 2001 (U.S.) —Suzanne D. Rich
| | | | (...) That's what I was referring to in my exclamation: "Are they serious? ...Zooters?!" and "I don't know if I even believe this..." I didn't want to come right out and say it. I'm no history expert. But I figured some people would know what I was (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The Toy Book's report on LEGO 2001 (U.S.) —Eric Brok
| | | | | (...) one of (...) Which reminds me: To the Dutch, the name 'Znap' actually sounds like 'is fake'. Pretty well chosen name for a toy which soley existed to beat Knex (and failed). Eric (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Toy Book's report on LEGO 2001 (U.S.) —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) Heh, someone should start a webpage that chronicles all the bad names (and why they're bad). Just so we don't lose track. :) --Todd (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
