Year 2001 : 573


Year / 2001 / 573	572 \| 574

Subject:	Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001
Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2001 16:42:28 GMT
Reply-To:	TOBIAS.MOLLER@TELIA.stopspamCOM
Viewed:	8 times

I suggest "House-rocking cool creatures" ^_^ --Tobias Tony Hafner wrote: > > I can't imagine that this hasn't been discussed, but I don't see anything on > it. Now that the battle droid bodies are being used for the martians, I > expect that they are here to stay. Hence, we need a general name for the > whole class of figures. I can't bring myself to call them "minifigs". > > Possible alternatives: > suckifigs > suckrofigs > manglefigs > uglyfigs > > Any others? Any previous discussion? > > -- > Tony Hafner > www.hafhead.com

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
(...) How about Wirefigs? They're kinda wiry and umm... stuff. -- I think it'd be funny if someone egged Martha Stewart's house. (24 years ago, 17-Jan-01, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)

Message is in Reply To:

		Do we have a name for the new figs?
I can't imagine that this hasn't been discussed, but I don't see anything on it. Now that the battle droid bodies are being used for the martians, I expect that they are here to stay. Hence, we need a general name for the whole class of figures. I (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)

10 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search