To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.year.2001Open lugnet.year.2001 in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Year / 2001 / 338
337  |  339
Subject: 
Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001
Date: 
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 22:50:03 GMT
Viewed: 
33 times
  
In lugnet.build.minifigs, Eric Joslin writes:
Any others?

Yeah.  How about:

  Martians

You miss the point.  I am talking about a name for the whole class of figs,
which would include martians, battle droids, and whatever else Lego comes
out with in the future that uses this construction style.

I actually have been meaning to post that after getting all the LoM sets
(apart from the big base, which no one seems to have found yet) I quite
like the martians, which surprises me, because frankly I expected to think
they were awful.

I'm OK with the look of the figure overall, though I like the Battle Droids
better in terms of both the head and the legs.

My main complaint, which is why all my name suggestions revolved around how
lame the figs are, is the mechanics.

Compare them to minifigs:
  * The wrists don't rotate- and further, the angle at which they are fixed
    is the wrong angle for many minifig accessories.  Even constructing the
    arm piece so that the two claws were 90 degrees off would greatly improve
    this aspect.
  * The legs, as pointed out in another post, are fused.
  * The legs won't stick to studs in a sitting position, thus requiring you
    to attach the figures to vehicles in more "creative" ways.
  * The head doesn't swivel.
  * On the figures made so far, the head is all an integrated piece in the
    sense that you can't take one face and swap it with another hat or other
    headgear.

And, of course, there is the fundamental issue that they /aren't/ actual
minifigs.  This means that the whole range of existing minifig body parts
are mostly not interchangeable.  You can't personalize a figure by swapping
out heads, legs, differently- printed torsos, etc.  This alone doesn't
completely damn the concept, as believable aliens could be cool- but when
you combine it with the fact that they are inferior in almost every other
way (all but price), you end up with a really crappy substitute for minifigs.

Side note on the martian sets- the T3 Trike is an absolutely awesome set.
It is by far the coolest thing I've seen Lego come up with in a very long
time.  This gives me much hope.  Note that I'm not including the Star Wars
sets in that comparison, as licensed products are a whole different ballgame.

--
Tony Hafner
www.hafhead.com



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
 
(...) Well, there's "mikifigs" (partly in honor of the fact that Senor Raton is built in the same, um, mickeymouse fashion). Since we have CRAPPs and POOPs, how 'bout Figs Absent Redeeming Traits? (...) This is more serious for Martians than for (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
 
(...) Yeah. How about: Martians I actually have been meaning to post that after getting all the LoM sets (apart from the big base, which no one seems to have found yet) I quite like the martians, which surprises me, because frankly I expected to (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)

10 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR