 | | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
I saw that too, as a advertisement before "Meet the Parents". Pretty cool, I thought, to see it advertised so mainstream. And a great place to advertise it too. Very precise marketing. Speaking of no Studios newsgroups yet . . . sounds like a good (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
I saw that too, as a advertisement before "Meet the Parents". Pretty cool, I thought, to see it advertised so mainstream. And a great place to advertise it too. Very precise marketing. Speaking of no Studios newsgroups yet . . . sounds like a good (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) My biggest problem with it, as a D&D player (although I haven't been in a campaign for a couple years now), was that the characters didn't act like D&D characters. I mean, I got a good chuckle at a couple of points imagining the interactions (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) A movie like that really has big shoes to fill, since it's competing against the imagination of millions (?) over 25+ years! Anything they tried would be bound to disappoint some viewers, I suppose, but I'm glad to hear it wasn't too bad... (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
|
|
(...) Not bad- FARTs. That could work. Or how about Weak Tiny Figures? (I'm still attached to "suckifigs", though.) (...) Agreed. (...) Good point... but it begs the question: If you really want your aliens to look different then why do they have 2 (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)
|
