 | | So what is "Underground", anyway? —Bruce Hietbrink
| | | | Hey all, Since LEGO never really developed this theme, this thematic area is really one for AFOLs to flesh out (like, for instance, the development of the Sea Monkeys in .aquazone). So what counts as "Underground"? Is it a particular tech level--the (...) (19 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.underground, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: So what is "Underground", anyway? —Rob Hendrix
| | | | | | "Bruce Hietbrink" <bnh@chem.ucla.edu> wrote in message news:IGp7r1.13Gx@lugnet.com... (...) "Underground" to me means that grey (bley? ;) area where the rules aren't quite defined. The place where the goings-on can't really be monitored or policed (...) (19 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.underground)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: So what is "Underground", anyway? —Nelson Yrizarry
| | | | | (...) Actually, IMHO, I think LEGO did develop the theme, albeit under different guises; the "ice" theme became "Arctic"; the rock/space theme became "Life on Mars"; the sense of 'adventure' became, well... "Adventurers"; etc. Maybe we need some (...) (19 years ago, 19-May-05, to lugnet.underground, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: So what is "Underground", anyway? —Scott Lyttle
| | | | | (...) Actually, I think LOM was developed out of town, because Star Wars sets were in production at that time. I think the premise was that LOM was an extension of the space collection on the town theme. Rumors are that TLG wasn't allowed to produce (...) (19 years ago, 19-May-05, to lugnet.underground, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: So what is "Underground", anyway? —Rob Hendrix
| | | | | (...) Sandhogs. Rob (19 years ago, 20-May-05, to lugnet.underground)
| | | | | | |
