Train Organizations : 462


Trains / Train Organizations / 462	461 \| 463

Subject:	Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
Newsgroups:	lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org
Date:	Thu, 30 Mar 2000 16:47:27 GMT
Viewed:	12 times

In lugnet.trains, Mike Poindexter writes: > I think that Lego is getting pretty ridiculous on their protection. > Lego-modular describes exactly what it is. What else should it be called? When I coined Legomodular I left the hyphen and capitalization out on purpose. Not really sure why except it seemed more suitable. Putting the hyphen back in emphasizes use of LEGO as an adjective. If there is a problem with it though, you have to ask, is there then a problem with Lugnet(tm)? After all, it expands to Lego User Group NETwork.. I dunno. ++Lar

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
Well, it is easier to ask for forgiveness than permission. I think that legomodular could be claimed as deprecating a brand more than LEGO(tm)-Modular could. Either way, it would seem very silly to have their legal department crack down on a couple (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
I think that Lego is getting pretty ridiculous on their protection. Lego-modular describes exactly what it is. What else should it be called? Modular train tables using ABS automatic binding bricks? That opens the door for people to use rivtek and (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)

24 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search