Subject:
|
Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:34:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7 times
|
| |
|
|
If they come to me and tell me that I can't call my Lego train layout that
has about a half-million of their bricks in it and costs tens of thousands
of dollars a Lego-modular layout, I will retort that they would prefer it to
a Megablock-modular layout. Their protect the brand name crusade is getting
silly in some instances. God forbid that people will mistake Suzanne's
Legopolis site as an official Lego site - it would be much better to have it
featuring porn.
Mike
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:38E35391.6FBE@mindspring.com...
> Mike Poindexter wrote:
> >
> > The preliminary page for Lego-modular standards is up at:
> > http://www.sirius.com/~latha/lego/modules/standards.htm
>
> Looks good, but one thing which just struck me is TLC's protectiveness
> of it's trademarks. We probably should either get permission to name the
> standard LEGO-Modular, or find a different name (but maybe I'm all wet).
>
> --
> Frank Filz
>
> -----------------------------
> Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
> Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
24 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
