 | | Frist Meeting in the St. Louis Area.
|
|
Any interested people in Saint Louis, Missouri, Illinois area and any others in the area wanting to start a Lego Club Wayne Green and I are meeting at the Steak and Shake at Saint Charles Rock Rd. Off I270 and I70 at 6:00 on Saturday 25 Mar 00. This (...) (27 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.us.mo, lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.town, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.il)
|
| |
| | Re: GFLTC Take on Modules...
|
|
Robin, I was wondering how you run the layouts when they're in cabinets? I noticed that at the GATS show your layout was against the wall, so you wouldn't be able to stand behind it. (or that's what the picture looked like) How do you change rolling (...) (27 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | GFLTC Take on Modules...
|
|
With over 70 post with in the last 24 hours, most on the table and module design. I thought I would give the GFLTC take on display modules. We don’t just use tables, we cover them, making them cabinets. It make it easy to setup and operate at shows. (...) (27 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Legomodular standards
|
|
Watch this space. A conference call (sponsored by Mercator Software Inc.) was just held among GMLTC and BAYLTC and I believe we've reached a consensus on legomodular standards, for module size, and for the interface points. I don't want to (...) (27 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
|
"Dean Husby" <nntp@akasa.bc.ca> wrote in message news:38D99A3F.9ED3C5...a.bc.ca... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) leaning (...) maximum (...) several reasons. 1) We didn't see any reason to re-invent the wheel - I am personally not a big NIH fan. 2) We (...) (27 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
|
John Kelly <jkelly69@skypoint.com> wrote in message news:Frw3yx.ELK@lugnet.com... (...) points (...) be (...) else's (...) strucuture (...) time a (...) span (...) Also leave some rows of technic bricks so that the bridge could use longer axles for (...) (27 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
|
I think we are on the same track here. I am doing that as well. One option that I think all involved would want is that you can have a "section" comprised of X modules where nothing matches the module standards where they break up EXCEPT where the (...) (27 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
|
We use 1/8" thick plexi on the side of our layouts. It has several benefits. -Keeps straying fingers away from the layout. -Helps keep pieces from 'wandering' away. -Keeps the trains, when they derail, from going on the floor. -People can still get (...) (27 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
|
(...) I agree with that completely. :-) <Snip> (...) at (...) I agree with this too!!! wow. My thought on this is to incorporate some technic pegs in the wall of the section that can take any bridging strucuture that snaps on. So that if there were (...) (27 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
|
Dear all, I'm impressed by the big amount of posts concerning module standards! And all this just because I started a little question in the beginning of this thread.... But to define standards seems to be a serious problem of all train clubs and I (...) (27 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
