 | | Re: "Challenger" version 2.0 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) That involved what? *One* set up and one tear down? Not impressed by show duration as a measure of level of effort as far as setup/teardown goes But getting people to cover shifts for 6 weeks, ya, that's impressive. (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: "Challenger" version 2.0 —Robert Powell
|
| | | | | >But getting people to cover shifts for 6 weeks, ya, that's impressive. You hit the nail on the head. We had a few members definitely take one for the team to make sure the layout was covered, especially during the Winter Festival. For 2 nights the (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: "Challenger" version 2.0 —Ray Silva
|
| | | | Well, it wasn't actually "one set-up" as the layout evolved and grew during the 6 weeks. Tables were added to expand the overall size of the layout, at times even while the musuem was open, which brought on a whold new set of challenges to deal (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Challenger" version 2.0 —Paul Thomas
|
| | | | (...) Don't forget we were published in the manaic mag Paul (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
