 | | Re: GATS Tampa Show...
|
| (...) minifig (...) standard 6 (...) track is (...) under (...) what (...) 10 (...) model (...) the same (...) comparisons are (...) relative (...) I still think 10 wide would be better, even if the minifigs are a little short. It would fit how the (...) (27 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.us.fl, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: GATS Tampa Show...
|
| I'm starting to be pursuaded that 8 wide is indeed superior to 6 wide. I may even build my next passinger train in that scale. But first I'd like to see some models that have been built in the 8 wide scale. Do you know any websites that show models (...) (27 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: GATS Tampa Show...
|
| Speaking of which, we *desperately* need a larger radius curve piece. I'm seriously considering building my own curves, but GAD, the work involved! (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do not associate my (...) (27 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: GATS Tampa Show...
|
| Seriously, what are you going to do when TLC introduces their new line of 8 wides trains? It's inevitable. Evolution and all that jazz... I mean, if TLC would get serious about producing model train sets, would you want them 6 wide and toylike? Why (...) (27 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: GATS Tampa Show...
|
| (...) In other words, they're not overweight, they're undertall! ;) Jeff (27 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.us.fl, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
