 | | Re: Train Module at BayLUG
|
|
(...) I'm interested to get more technical details, and I'd love to post a definitive instruction page for building the tables on BayLUG ala the page I did for the PNLTC design, ((URL) What are the chances we could make a 'transition table'? Take a (...) (27 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf.sj, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Train Module at BayLUG
|
|
(...) Na. I already know and I have the bloody knuckles to prove it. just kidding. Seriously, how do you know you're on the right track? While John G posted some of the details regarding modules (2x3 of the 15 inch base plates, track insets, how (...) (27 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf.sj, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Train Module at BayLUG
|
|
Agreed, November would be better, IMHO Paul Sinasohn (27 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf.sj, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Train Module at BayLUG
|
|
(...) Ouch, that's a lot of money. How are you planning on getting the layout to San Jose? Doesn't sound like driving. Hmmm, checking AAA Map-N-Go, yow, 2100 miles (~36 hours), I can see why. (27 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Train Module at BayLUG
|
|
(...) I'm interested, though it's only fair to say I won't be there this time. Yet, put this in your pipe and smoke it: what about having a train-themed meeting for November? Note that I'm replying to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf in hopes that even more (...) (27 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf.sj, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Train Module at BayLUG
|
|
(...) The GMLTC is currently discussing the possibilities of being at the NMRA show next year in San Jose. We would very much like to do it, but we would need some "support" (ahem!) from either the NMRA, or perhaps even TLG / LSI (dreaming!)... Our (...) (27 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Train Module at BayLUG
|
|
Would people be interested in seeing how the GMLTC modules are made? I am working on one and am trying to finish it before the BayLUG meeting. I would prefer to hear that people are actually interested, though, as it is really putting me under the (...) (27 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf.sj, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: A challenge for seasoned Lego Trainers...
|
|
lol Ed, *That's* the challenge part-- Lego only;-) -John (...) (27 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: A challenge for seasoned Lego Trainers...
|
|
Can I interject a bit here for my own clarification? We're talking about a LEGO only solution, right? I've added Kadee couplers and uncoupler magnets to perform this type of remote uncoupling, but that may not apply in this thread if the solution is (...) (27 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: A challenge for seasoned Lego Trainers...
|
|
(...) This question does not parse. It does stick up between ties and it does lever the two cars apart, was that what you were asking? if sessior == scissor, then the answer is no, it's not exactly a scissor action. (...) No. (...) That is a (...) (27 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.build)
|
