 | | Re: The effects of Bulk Sales are evident.... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | Warning, a bit rambly post on the theory of realistic building scenes. (...) They (the MichLUG buildings) were stunning buildings but I think they suffered from not being close enough together. Anything 5 stories or more ought to be cheek to jowl (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The effects of Bulk Sales are evident.... —John Kelly
|
| | | | | Argh!!! Three times in a row I agree with Larry! The sky is falling... the sky is falling!!! -john (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The effects of Bulk Sales are evident.... —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Okay, here's a for instance. Three of my buildings' footprints are: 28 x 44, 26 x 50, and 30 x 42. Surely those aren't "monstrosities"! Who's with me here? -John (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The effects of Bulk Sales are evident.... —John Gerlach
|
| | | | | (...) <sound of crickets chirping> ;-) JohnG, GMLTC (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The effects of Bulk Sales are evident.... —James Powell
|
| | | | (...) Ya, but I thought that the entire layout was only about 16'x16'. That means, that your smallest building is about 2x the size of the layout :) (no, a 26x50 building is not all that big. I tend towards 32x32 as a max size for normal buildings, (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
