 | | Re: 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ? —Mike Walsh
|
| | | "Rick Clark" <jrclark@nospam.aol.com> wrote in message news:3A513A94.87EF98...aol.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) worked (...) advantages in (...) Along this same line, the train windows currently being produced in the soccer bus sets and in (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ? —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | (...) <snippage> (...) (taking a shot into the dark) Might it have something to do with simplifying the mold process for that part. By elminating those 'thru the rail' slots, they now have/had a more simple molding operation. Same might be true of (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I know a little. In considering how to mold a part you have to consider every concave surface carefully. Many things with concave surfaces can nevertheless be made with non dynamic two part molds if you choose the mold separation line (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
