To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 7420
7419  |  7421
Subject: 
Re: Modelling boolean gates with trains
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.edu, lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 20 Sep 2000 13:47:07 GMT
Reply-To: 
mattdm@^stopspammers^mattdm.org
Viewed: 
67 times
  
Dave Low <stinglessbee@hotSPAMFREEmail.com> wrote:
I'm thinking "train on the line"=1, "not on the line"=0. NOT could be done by
reversing the trains direction, OR by having two tracks enter one line at

If NOT is reversing direction, than 1 is forward and 0 is back. (Or the
other way around; whatever.)

But I'd be curious to hear how you envision more complicated logic!

--
Matthew Miller                     --->                 mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                    --->              http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux            --->               http://linux.bu.edu/



Message is in Reply To:
  Modelling boolean gates with trains
 
Okay, this might be totally impossible (or insane or banal), but has anyone modelled boolean functions on a train layout (System or Duplo)? At the moment I'm thinking "train on the line"=1, "not on the line"=0. NOT could be done by reversing the (...) (24 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.edu, lugnet.trains)

4 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
6 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR