|
Okay, this might be totally impossible (or insane or banal), but has anyone
modelled boolean functions on a train layout (System or Duplo)? At the moment
I'm thinking "train on the line"=1, "not on the line"=0. NOT could be done by
reversing the trains direction, OR by having two tracks enter one line at
points, but what about AND ? Or does AND not make sense given the definitions
of 1 and 0? Maybe you need "train pushing a wagon"=1...
--DaveL
(sorry for any excess cross-posting)
|
|
Message has 3 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Modelling boolean gates with trains
|
| If by 1 your mean TRUE and by 0 you mean FALSE, and given that in Boolean logic TRUE = NOT FALSE, then two conclusions from what you have said is "train on the line" = "reversed" "train not on the line" and "train not on the line = "reversed" "train (...) (24 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Modelling boolean gates with trains -Brian Alano (20-Sep-00 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Modelling boolean gates with trains -Matthew Miller (20-Sep-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.edu, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Modelling boolean gates with trains -Andrew Lipson (20-Sep-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.edu, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|