 | | Re: Caboose to go with my recently completed Locomotive. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) It came out pretty nice, and thanks for the credit! I'd like to think that over the years, a number of cabeese have been inspired by that one (all the good looking ones, and none of the ones that look too tall, naturally :-) ). (...) some (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Caboose to go with my recently completed Locomotive. —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | (...) Cabeese? (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Caboose to go with my recently completed Locomotive. —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | | (...) The plural form of caboose? Fredrik (24 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Caboose to go with my recently completed Locomotive. —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | | (...) In a kidding sort of way yes. I thinks its just one of those confusing parts of the English language. For example the plural of goose is geese but the plural of Moose is not Meese its Moose the sigular is the same as the plural. I believe that (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Caboose to go with my recently completed Locomotive. —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | | Hmm.. Mr. Dictionary says Moose isn't an English word, it's Algonquin. Not fair game! Caboose is more Germanic, Dutch 'kabuis' being in that family along with English, so it still proves there's no telling about the rules. Sticking with English, (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Caboose to go with my recently completed Locomotive. —Christopher Masi
|
| | | | (...) "What would you consider too tall?" he asks sheepishly while hoping the response is not, "Why of course, yours is too tall." (...) I thought the yellow door meant that the car was used for news paper service?[1] And what is a plug door? [1] (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
