| | DCC Project Survey Matthew Bates
|
| | How many people are interested in my DCC project? Please email me with an interest level (0-5) 0. I think it's a silly idea. 1. Yes it's interesting but I'm happy with standard LEGO trains. 2. If I could buy it ready-made and it was cheap, I might (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: DCC Project Survey Doug Glasnapp
|
| | | | (...) I'll choose #3 as well. It has been a lifelong dream to have several trains running on a big layout controled from my computer. If the process of putting it togther only requires minimal "amatuer" soldering, I may be up to putting it (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: DCC Project Survey Thomas Main
|
| | | | (...) Put me in at #3. Of course, if you develop this and sell it, I will finally have to give up using 12V track and accessories and buy 9V. That is, unless you also devlop a version using the 12V center rails :) (...) -- Thomas Main (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: DCC Project Survey John Neal
|
| | | | It's a great idea. One Lego should have come up with by now. (3). Perhaps Lego will copy your design and make their own, the same way they stole your crossing track;) BTW, can it be Mac compatible? -John (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: DCC Project Survey Matthew Bates
|
| | | | | | (...) That's one reason I was reluctant to work on it before Christmas, with the lack of any new trains for 2 years and with all the electronic gizmos Lego have been making I was worried that maybe they had been busy working on a DCC [1] system of (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: DCC Project Survey Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | Put me down as a 3 and I'd probably get 5 or 6 units if the price were reasonable. (300-400 total for 5 units and the interface to my PC) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | (canceled) Matthew Bates
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Re: DCC Project Survey Jim Rosikiewicz
|
| | | | (...) Matt, Put me down as 4 and maybe 5.... Thanks Jim (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: DCC Project Survey John Boreczky
|
| | | | Put me down as a 3. I assume that DCC decoders are cheap enough that I could equip ~15 motors and not choke at the expense. (Forgive my naivete about model railroading - I haven't bought a non-Lego train since the mid '70s.) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: DCC Project Survey Louise Belles
|
| | | | (...) #3--with really good directions, so a newbie can make it work (without help from the computer kids;) Make it a good day. Louise Belles (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: DCC Project Survey Mark Harrison
|
| | | | Hi Matthew, You can put me down for No.3 as well, provided the final product is as durable as Lego and comes with a replacement warranty. Mark H. (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: DCC Project Survey Steve Bliss
|
| | | | I'm either a 2 or a 4, depending on how complicated #4 is. Steve (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: DCC Project Survey Daniel Heppler
|
| | | | Hi Put me also to level 3 I did some searches on the internet some month ago. Here a good comparison. It seems to me that the mrc stuff could be a solution for our lego train problems. Daniel Heppler Burgdorf, Switzerland Matthew Bates schrieb in (...) (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: DCC Project Survey Michel Magnan
|
| | | | Hi Matt, Sorry I am late replying to your survey, I haven't had computer access for about a week. Put me down for number 3 or 4. In one of the recent model train magazines they were advertising a voltage regulator, which could limit DCC output to (...) (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: DCC Project Survey Christopher Masi
|
| | | | I would have to go with a #4. I am just guessing that #3 would be too exspensive for me. Chris (...) (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |