To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 4826
4825  |  4827
Subject: 
Re: Chimney Mount of 396 Thatcher Perkins
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 15 Mar 2000 21:21:50 GMT
Viewed: 
1191 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Hao-yang Wang writes:
Look at <http://www.brickshelf.com/scans/0000/0396/0396-09.html>, step 17.

Instead of simply using a 2x2 brick to mount the chimney, the designers went
to a lot of trouble to insert a 1x2 tile there. Why? To make the chimney break
off easily?

Cheers,
Hao-yang Wang
There is a 2x3 plate that fits on top of the 1x2 plate in the next step.  The
studs from the 1x2 fit into the 'holes' of the 2x3, so the 1x2 tile is needed,
otherwise the smokestack wouldn't fit on it at all.

JohnG, GMLTC



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Chimney Mount of 396 Thatcher Perkins
 
(...) Right, if they used a 2x2 brick they would then need a 3x3 plate which doesn't exist. Thanks! /Eric McC/ (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: Chimney Mount of 396 Thatcher Perkins
 
(...) Aahh. Even with the traditional bricks and plates, there are always new tricks for me to learn. Thanks for pointing it out. Hao-yang Wang (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Chimney Mount of 396 Thatcher Perkins
 
Look at (URL), step 17. Instead of simply using a 2x2 brick to mount the chimney, the designers went to a lot of trouble to insert a 1x2 tile there. Why? To make the chimney break off easily? Cheers, Hao-yang Wang (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)

5 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR