To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 3947
3946  |  3948
Subject: 
Re: Interesting (old) Editorial
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 31 Jan 2000 09:41:55 GMT
Viewed: 
2741 times
  
That's harsh! 1983 had some fantastic Lego train sets. I could onyl imagine
what they would write about today's crop of sets if they disliked the 1983
sets.

Its not that harsh, this is from one of the more serious model railway mag's at
the time, with a fair amount of 4mm finescale.  It is more that they are a good
toy, poor model type statement than anything else, and they do at least credit
lego with trying! (far better than Hornby at the time)

James



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Interesting (old) Editorial
 
James Powell wrote in message ... (...) gone (...) may (...) really up (...) That's harsh! 1983 had some fantastic Lego train sets. I could onyl imagine what they would write about today's crop of sets if they disliked the 1983 sets. (25 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR