 | | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide) —Russell Clark
|
| | | (...) I remember telling myself I needed to take close-up shots. Ummmm, I just found this link: (URL) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide) —James Powell
|
| | | | | (...) Assuming they are semmetical, the trains then are 20 studs wide. Better get that car _much_ wider there John! (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Ahh, it appears that the different LLs are using different scales-- from 16-20 studs wide. I think I will stick to around 14 wide because I am going to use G scale wheels (and track, for that matter) and that width (13-14 studs) is about (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide) —James Powell
|
| | | | | | (1:22.5 to around 1:32), according to my feeble-minded (...) 1:1 to 1:32. Not quite the smallest you can ride behind...Our current club newsletter (Vancouver Island Model Engineers) shows a O gauge engine hauling 2 people. There was a story 20 (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide) —Kevin Maynes
|
| | | | | (...) Yikes.. that looks like... 20-wide! No room for Selective Compression there! K.M. (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide) —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) pieces. I bet The Purists are drooling over this shot;-) I personally am not a big fan of this type of modeling (where one needs to "create" a windshield like this). It works well on such projects as creating a 30 foot Mt Rushmore, but for (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
