To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 30416
30415  |  30417
Subject: 
Re: LEGOdometer
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:53:32 GMT
Viewed: 
3137 times
  
In lugnet.technic, David Laswell wrote:
   In lugnet.announce.moc, Shaun Sullivan wrote:
   As is my tendency, here’s an absurdly long treatise describing the development of a LEGO Train Odometer Car (a.k.a. the “LEGOdometer”).

Interesting. I thought this might be interesting to use in our displays...until I read that it binds up in reverse. When we lose a car for whatever reason (often some young kid’s hand straying where it ought not to), we usually recouple by running the train in reverse to pick up the stragglers. Perhaps your next iteration could have a slip gear system that disengages in reverse and engages when going forward?

That’s something I hadn’t considered. Fortunately, unless it’s run backwards for a long time, it probably won’t be an issue. It takes a good while to take up the lash in all of the gears in the opposite direction; the overall gear reduction is 1:1685.099 over 9 different gear pairs. That translates to plenty of distance before the hundreths wheel starts runing in reverse.

On top of that, the first ratchet is actually on the second dial, the tenths place. As a result the gear train won’t actually bind up until the engagement on the tenths dial has run backwards and tries to turn the spoked pin joiner backwards.

Short story: it’s unlikely that the car will bind up unless it’s running backwards for a while.


  
   As Dave Eaton likes to point out, the length of the outside rail on a circular train track will be longer than the length of the inside rail. This same effect holds true with nearly all train layouts that are seen in shows; the length of one of the rails will be longer than the other. So the question becomes – what do we truly want to measure? The distance the train has gone around the outside rail? The distance along the inner rail? Or some distance in between?

I would think it would measure the outer rail at high speeds and the inner rail at slow speeds. The reasoning is that at slow speeds, assuming the motor bogey is pulling rather than pushing, it will pull the train against the inside rail so there will be more friction on that side of the bogeys. At high speeds, however, momentum comes into effect, and if you’ve ever watched a LEGO train moving at significant speed, anything but the most lightweight of cars will heel over a bit when it slams into the curve, so the inner wheels will actually lose contact with the rails for a bit as they lift up, while the outer wheels will be pressed into the rail.

That’s another good point. Based on your observation at high speeds even a differential won’t be truly accurate; in fact, it could be much worse! If the inner wheels lose contact altogether, then an averaging differential will give a value between “fast” and “stop” - which would correspond to a much smaller distance than even the inner rail alone would produce.

Hmmm, that might be a good argument to stick with the solid axle!



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: LEGOdometer
 
(...) A differential might have other problems. I seem to recall that use of differentials was explored in geared locomotives (such as Shay, Climax, and Heisler), and was abandoned because the differential caused power loss in curves. (reference (...) (16 years ago, 7-Aug-08, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains)
  Re: LEGOdometer
 
(...) True, but then you're losing the count on some of the distance traveled. I thought of a better option to all of this, though. I can't remember who it was, but someone (don't even ask me to remember who, or where to find this) came up with a (...) (16 years ago, 9-Aug-08, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LEGOdometer
 
(...) Interesting. I thought this might be interesting to use in our displays...until I read that it binds up in reverse. When we lose a car for whatever reason (often some young kid's hand straying where it ought not to), we usually recouple by (...) (16 years ago, 5-Aug-08, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains, FTX)

29 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR