 | | Re: Santa Fe B-Unit: OK or not? —Timothy Gould
|
| | | (...) It's good to hear they will act. Does this mean you create needlepoint and collect Lego? Interesting combination of hobbies. (...) Copyright law is complex. Ownership of copyright is usually very easy (at least when it's not part of a (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jun-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Santa Fe B-Unit: OK or not? —John Patterson
|
| | | | (...) not exactly. The printing of the design can be copyright, however what you do with building it is not. I am more familiar with the needlework part of this for an example. You cannot copy the instructions, however you can stitch as many designs (...) (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Santa Fe B-Unit: OK or not? —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) On closer inspection it would appear that copyright law is a bit more complex in what it covers than I realised (second paragraph of (URL) suspect that Lego may differ from needlepoint because of this in that it is (most probably) counted as a (...) (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
