 | | Re: first train MOCS ever. —John Neal
| | | | In lugnet.announce.moc, Nathan Proudlove wrote: <snip> (...) Welcome to Trains, welcome to 8wide, Nathan! You have some very nice entry MOCs here, and have quickly ascertained the dilemma facing train builders-- form to follow function, or function (...) (18 years ago, 4-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: first train MOCS ever. —Timothy Gould
| | | | | (...) I will echo John's sentiments... except for the eight-wide bit. It is an evil scale and far too large ;) Go to six or seven and feel the love. Tim PS. I especially liked the Shay but they're both really good first trains. (18 years ago, 4-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: first train MOCS ever. —Nathan Proudlove
| | | | | (...) I have heard the 8 wide vs. 6 and 7 wide debate before. Truth be told, I will probably go with 6 wide for shows from now on. 8 wide trains are he-he-heavy and brutal on motors when run for long periods of time. I do prefer the actual look of (...) (18 years ago, 5-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: first train MOCS ever. —John Neal
| | | | | (...) :-) (...) :-( (...) :-) JOHN (18 years ago, 5-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | |
