Subject:
|
Re: first train MOCS ever.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sun, 5 Feb 2006 06:02:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3321 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Nathan Proudlove wrote:
| |
| |
I will echo John’s sentiments... except for the eight-wide bit. It is an
evil scale and far too large ;) Go to six or seven and feel the love.
|
I have heard the 8 wide vs. 6 and 7 wide debate before.
|
:-)
| |
Truth be told, I
will probably go with 6 wide for shows from now on.
|
:-(
| |
8 wide trains are
he-he-heavy and brutal on motors when run for long periods of time. I do
prefer the actual look of the 8 wide scale though.
|
:-)
JOHN
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: first train MOCS ever.
|
| (...) I have heard the 8 wide vs. 6 and 7 wide debate before. Truth be told, I will probably go with 6 wide for shows from now on. 8 wide trains are he-he-heavy and brutal on motors when run for long periods of time. I do prefer the actual look of (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
