 | | Re: Indian EMU —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Interesting. The prototype seems rather squat (much wider proportionally than your model), can you try to lower the height of this model at all to achieve that look? I like the front pilot/buffers area. (20 years ago, 10-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Indian EMU —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | (...) Hi Lar, Thanks for the comments. It's a wide, wide-gauge train but I just couldn't bring myself to go to seven wide even though the model REALLY needs it. I might be able to squeeze one plate lower (need to check on a brickbuilt version) but (...) (20 years ago, 10-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Indian EMU —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) I hear that! So tell us more about this one day challenge thing? (20 years ago, 10-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Indian EMU —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Since Samarth has outed himself elsewhere in the thread you know who it was with now. Basically Swami and I had been talking about building a train (this one for me and the Ghan in eight-wide for him) for a while so I suggested half-jokingly (...) (20 years ago, 10-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Indian EMU —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Seriously-- why would that be "hard to do"? Aversion to creating wide trains is baffling to me. This MOC could easily be built 9 wide, going by the looks of the prototype, and it would look great at that width! Forget about conventions, Tim. (...) (20 years ago, 10-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Indian EMU —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | (...) If your other trains are eight-wide I'd say this should be a least nine-wide, possibly ten. (...) What I enjoy is trying to capture the look of something with the extra challenge imposed by limiting myself to six-wide (and typically built on a (...) (20 years ago, 10-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Indian EMU —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Sure, but you can't defy the laws of geometry, Captain! The shape of the loco is clearly a rectangle, so if you chose to limit yourself and create it 6 wide, then (as Lar pointed out) it needs to be a lot shorter. So short, in fact, that it (...) (20 years ago, 10-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Indian EMU —Samarth Moray
|
| | | | (...) Oi! I said I'd do the 8 wide Ghan as soon as I can! *shakes fist* just you wait till the 14th!! (...) The EMUs run on 5ft 6in gauge track. In addition to this, they're wider than regular stock too. Tim, nice model, a contest winner if I ever (...) (20 years ago, 10-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Indian EMU —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Cool! A gauge that can be accurately modeled at minifig scale! Built that sucka 10 wide! JOHN (20 years ago, 10-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Indian EMU —Samarth Moray
|
| | | | (...) Exactly what do you mean by 'precise'? I'd love to know. I build loads of IR models that are of this gauge, so any scale conversion (from real world to in the brick) you might have handy would be great for me. I suck at math :-P Legoswami (20 years ago, 10-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Indian EMU —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Well, maybe precise was too exact a term:-) But I figure it like this: I assume a scale of 1:48 (which is "O" scale). O scale model railroad locos are 8 studs wide, but LEGO track gauge is wider than O scale track gauge. So in essence, LEGO (...) (20 years ago, 10-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | |
