To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 26011
26010  |  26012
Subject: 
Re: Indian EMU
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:51:48 GMT
Viewed: 
2338 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:

   What I enjoy is trying to capture the look of something with the extra challenge imposed by limiting myself to six-wide

Sure, but you can’t defy the laws of geometry, Captain! The shape of the loco is clearly a rectangle, so if you chose to limit yourself and create it 6 wide, then (as Lar pointed out) it needs to be a lot shorter. So short, in fact, that it will no longer be minifig scale.

You know, even TLG breaks the “rules” now and then and creates 6 wide cars and 8 wide rolling stock... ;-)

JOHN



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Indian EMU
 
(...) If your other trains are eight-wide I'd say this should be a least nine-wide, possibly ten. (...) What I enjoy is trying to capture the look of something with the extra challenge imposed by limiting myself to six-wide (and typically built on a (...) (19 years ago, 10-Oct-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

16 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR