 | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —Bryan Kinkel
|
| | | Gary, Don't get all disappointed. It was me who originally made the post about the subject of the message. I was catching up on emails, LUGNET posts, etc and saw the "New Lego Track!" subject. Of course it was not what I expected it to be. If my (...) (20 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —Jan-Albert van Ree
|
| | | | | (...) Those were deemed too complicated and that's why they're not in the 9V system anymore. (20 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —Bryan Kinkel
|
| | | | | | | Too complicated for adults? Or too complicated for children? Did LEGO determine that the automated parts were too complex for their target audience (children?) Assuming it is *financially viable*, why can't LEGO have introductory train sets for (...) (20 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) They already do that. Duplo trains for children, 9 volt for those up to 11 or so. After 12, it's all rock 'n roll, girls, and video games, and girls. "Adults" are supposed to move on to model railroading;-) JOHN (20 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) Been there, done that... didn't like it, came here instead. (20 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | (...) Degenerate. ;-) JOHN (20 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) Yep-did HO for years--too much time and not enough fun. I'll stick with the "L" gauge now :) Dave K (20 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —Bryan Kinkel
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) I have a stack of Lionel & RailKing catalogs that I use for building inspiration. If I start ordering things from those catalogs, I will be in real deep with my wife! -- Bryan "John" <John@TCLTC.org> wrote in message (...) (20 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) You mean to say that, given your LEGO habit, you aren't there already??? Slacker. :-) JOHN (20 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —Jan-Albert van Ree
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Adults weren't even considered a market in those days... (...) Logistics, cost, risk and it not being a core market. Nothing else. (20 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —Juhana Siren
|
| | | | | | (...) Complicated --- hrm. I was a child in the 80's and absolutely loved those. They certainly weren't too complicated - and remember that they were provided with the same kind of instructions (excellent, that is) as other Lego sets. If (...) (20 years ago, 20-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —Jan-Albert van Ree
|
| | | | | | Juhana Siren wrote: [SNIP] (...) It's easy to get by in Europe, I know several folks who are switching to 9V to be able to participate in events. But the signals usually don't change hands, since those can be modded to work on 9V too ;) As for the (...) (20 years ago, 20-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —Juhana Siren
|
| | | | | | (...) Yep; just change the one resistor... oh well... no such events in .fi, although you do see some Lego trains in the bigger stores... (...) And it's a damn shame, when Lego could be changing the times instead... :P OR at least they could be (...) (20 years ago, 23-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —Niels Karsdorp
|
| | | | | | (...) LEGO had remote controlled locomotives back in 1968. Blow the whistle (included in the trainset) and the train went forward. Blow the whistle, the train stops. Soon a new version was introduced, which also supported the train going backwards. (...) (20 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) How's this for a "big risk": I say, scrap the 9 volt system, and produce specialized train parts (from the trucks on up) that are to scale with "O" gauge. Have AFOLs use existing trucks, motors, couplers, and track currently used (and already (...) (20 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track! —Gary Quinlan
|
| | | | (...) Accepted, I'm somewhat less disappointed now! (...) Yes, and a good start would be a larger radius curved track (had to add my plug) (...) I don't think its a risk rather than a lack of will (only my opinion) (...) True, and may I add (...) (20 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
