Subject:
|
Re: Train Bases
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:55:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1294 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> I believe some builders use them embedded
I can't see how... I was under the impression that it would be easier to simply
use stacked plates instead. Embedding a train base would solve a lot of problems
with the motor connection issues, since the holes for mating would already be
there, but you'd have to basically surround the base with 1 x x plates on either
sides. These wouldn't be practical if you were going to have, say a catwalk on
the side. Unless of course, you'd be going for a design that exceeded the length
of the base itself, where you could connect the surrounding 1 x x plates with
bigger plates on the sides. Which would normally be the case, IMO. This again is
assuming youre going for a 2/3 base height in the first place....
Legoswami Samarth
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Train Bases
|
| (...) You have to be careful using the train base holes with vehicles longer than one base, since the bogie centres distance becomes so large that a motor (4x6 plate size) cannot turn far enough inside the train base on curves, so the vehicle (...) (19 years ago, 8-Feb-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Train Bases
|
| (...) I believe some builders use them embedded... but they are kinda short for most 8 wide cars.... I have a big stack of them myself because I don't use bases much but I can't bring myself to sell them yet. I think I will use a bunch for a factory (...) (19 years ago, 8-Feb-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
