 | | Re: Pushing it... 3 more 8 wide trains —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Well, 8wide is "not so much" for me but I think these have captured their respective prototypes pretty well. I especially liked the MK and the Baldwin as they haven't been done so much as ALCO RS units have. Thanks for sharing. Really wanna (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Pushing it... 3 more 8 wide trains —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Really wanna depress me? ....;-) What point would there be to that? JOHN (21 years ago, 13-Dec-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Pushing it... 3 more 8 wide trains —Ondrew Hartigan
|
| | | | | | (...) John has a point hear. Why limit yourself to 6 wide when you can do so much more with 8. Hell, why not 9 wide. It gives you more room for the little details and also makes it possible to make the main part of most modern engines 6 wide which (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Pushing it... 3 more 8 wide trains —Christopher Masi
|
| | | | | | (...) Thanks for the smile. Chris (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Pushing it... 3 more 8 wide trains —Josh Baakko
|
| | | | (...) Thanks Lar, I do have a few 6-wides rolling around the SCLTC layout, but... I have a few more Locomotives I'm slipped on to Brickshelf in the last few days, I'll post later this week when I get more... And yes, they are possible to be built in (...) (21 years ago, 14-Dec-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
