Subject:
|
Re: Pushing it... 3 more 8 wide trains
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:48:32 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjmasi@*IHATESPAMnogarbageplease*rcn.com
|
Viewed:
|
3391 times
|
| |
|
|
ondrew hartigan wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Thanks for sharing. Really wanna impress me? Do them 6 wide!
> >
> > Really wanna {de}press me? ....;-)
> >
> > What point would there be to that?
> >
> > [JOHN]
>
>
> John has a point hear. Why limit yourself to 6 wide when you can do so much more
> with 8. Hell, why not 9 wide. It gives you more room for the little details and
> also makes it possible to make the main part of most modern engines 6 wide which
> makes it easier to build and gives it a much nicer look.
>
> ondrew
> <<http://www.zacktron.com/temp/ratherbe.jpg>>
Thanks for the smile.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Pushing it... 3 more 8 wide trains
|
| (...) John has a point hear. Why limit yourself to 6 wide when you can do so much more with 8. Hell, why not 9 wide. It gives you more room for the little details and also makes it possible to make the main part of most modern engines 6 wide which (...) (23 years ago, 13-Dec-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
