 | | Re: PCC (was Re: Success at Pleasanton GATS —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) I'm not too worried. You won't be able to build it in 6 wide. So Peter's title is safe, I expect. (22 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: PCC (was Re: Success at Pleasanton GATS —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) That's because you can't defy the laws of physics, Captain [1]; the wheels *must* be shrouded.... When will you learn that you can't "grand right and left" with a 1 armed square dancer? -John [1] even money on James Mathis, though;-) (22 years ago, 4-Dec-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: PCC (was Re: Success at Pleasanton GATS —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Actually.... no, they don't need to be, Ensign Decker. Some are some aren't, and running the truck without any sideframe at all is not a bad approximation, actually. (22 years ago, 5-Dec-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: PCC (was Re: Success at Pleasanton GATS —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) I agree about the omission of the motor sideframes-- that's a given. It's just that the MOC sits so high on the trucks, it makes for one interesting first step on or off the trolley;-) Avoiding that problem building 8 wide is hard enough, let (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
