|
|
 | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) of (...) That is a very good design. Thanks for the tip--I have been wanting to use these porthole panels this way but did not take time to engineer it. My first thought about portholes for trains (especially 10020) was to use thin-wall panel (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| | | | | Re: 8 Wide State of the Art Advancement?
|
| (...) hey! that's my stuff :) You are correct, I originally posted the MR Trainmaster in December. I just made the boxcars and the container car this weekend, the caboose had been finished in December but not posted, because I wanted to wait until I (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: No big Deal: B-Unit for 10020 Super Chief
|
| (...) Union rules. Back when, anything with a number was a loco. Since a B unit had no number, it was not a loco, hence not needing a crew... That's why you see 300F, 300A, 300 B, 300C for example on a ABBA arrangement of F units (IIRC, that was (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: No big Deal: B-Unit for 10020 Super Chief
|
| (...) 3 is right for most "B" units. If you want specifics, get appropriate copies of "Extra 2200 South" (IIRC, that is the correct title, the railfan's Diesel spotter mag) (...) Ya, the real ones would have doors in the nose. My F has a simulated (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: My Sante Fe 10020
|
| (...) Trains are on the upsurge as a theme among adults (thanks in large part to all the clubs and their activities). And this 10020 both confirms the momentum (why build it if it isn't going to sell?) and will help build that momentum. We have a (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
