 | | Re: Santa Fe Numbers
|
|
Weoird, but cool. My 354 was a set from 1972, the year I was born. Not really excited about the content, but at least its "town". My other number (94) was from a set which didnt have much info attached to it. But the picture was cool. -Rob "Mike (...) (23 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Super Chief orders and arrivals
|
|
I ordered two Saturday morning and they arrived today, one week later. We live in Idaho. Our sets came USPS. Rose "George Notel" <lego@notelin.com> wrote in message news:Gs0nL7.955@lugnet.com... (...) about (...) today, (...) (23 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Super Chief orders and arrivals
|
|
(...) I ordered mine on 2/17/02 with some other items, everything arrived but the 10020. It's making me wonder if it got back ordered for real, or the USPS is working at normal speed. Daniel #574 (23 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Santa Fe Numbers
|
|
After I received my Santa Fe sets yesterday I was thinking about the numbers. Sure it would be nice to have a really low number (like less than 10) but it would also be pretty neat to have a number that corresponds to a classic or favorite LEGO set. (...) (23 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
"Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:Gs08E2.KL3@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) HTML (...) (4.78). (...) [ ... snipped ... ] While I can see the registry now, I am unable to complete the registration page. It errors out on (...) (23 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
