 | | Re: More train ranting (sorry) —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) Agreed. (...) Are we talking about the 4561 canopy??? I'm not sure... But if so I do NOT see that as designed for trains. (1) At least, not US ones. Don't get me started on a wishlist of parts that I wish they'd design, I don't have time and (...) (25 years ago, 27-May-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: More train ranting (sorry) —Eric Brok
| | | | | (...) I said designing *for* trains, not designing *after* trains. :-) As many people regret, these are very different things with current LEGO developments. Eric (25 years ago, 31-May-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: More train ranting (sorry) —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) I'm gonna go by what someone else said. Since it appears in at least one other set in a different theme introduced the same year, not necessarily designed for the train line. (In an argumentative mood today) (25 years ago, 31-May-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: More train ranting (sorry) —Fredrik Glöckner
| | | | | (...) In fact, it appears in several non-train sets: 6433, 6435 and 6453. I would say that claiming that it is designed for the train line is a bit controversial. But then again, I don't have the insight in the TLG design process that others may (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | |
