Subject:
|
Re: JackStone & (10 wide)Trains
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Jul 2001 01:21:29 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cmasi@cmasi.chem.tulane.ANTISPAMedu
|
Viewed:
|
465 times
|
| |
|
|
John Neal wrote:
>
> Funny that you should mention JS and trains, because I did some preliminary
> calculations on his size and have determined that he is the perfect scale for
> the LEGO track gauge, if you wanted to simulate standard gauge (4' 8.5").
>
> That would mean that the LEGO trains would need to be......10 WIDE!!!{:^D
> Woo-Hoo, a new width to model!!! (That's figuring that 1 stud = 1 foot)
>
> Putting 10 wide on my to-do list,
> John
>
> David Graham wrote:
>
> > I noticed the new JackStone sets in a toy shop and thought that the vehicle
> > cabs could be used on trains. They are six studs wide and would give a nice
> > curved front to a train. They are available in red and yellow. They look
> > as if they can be turned though 90 degrees to give different height/lengths.
> >
> > Has anyone got one and tried them out?
> >
> > They are in sets 4609 fire engine (red), 4606 Aqua-Res-Q (yellow) and 4607
> > Res-Q copter & tansporter.
> >
> > David
I don't have a Jack Stone figure, but aren't they two studs wide? If they are
two studs wide and 1 stud equals 1 foot, then that is one WIDE butt.
Chris
--
See some of my LEGO creations at http://cmasi.chem.tulane.edu/~lego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: JackStone & (10 wide)Trains
|
| Funny that you should mention JS and trains, because I did some preliminary calculations on his size and have determined that he is the perfect scale for the LEGO track gauge, if you wanted to simulate standard gauge (4' 8.5"). That would mean that (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
