 | | Re: New Train Sets #10013 and #10014
|
|
(...) The set I like the most out of these new ones is the caboose (URL) it is OK. The ends are on backwards (in my mind the tall support things should slope inwards and be square on the inside edge). (URL) one is very cute. I bet it will sell well. (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New Train Sets #10013 and #10014
|
|
(...) Think so too... (...) Yes, but i wish they were red & white... (...) Thats what i was thinking too... I'll have to get back into LEGO 6/8 wide trains... Those white quarter circle panels make me happy, not more brasso to get white ones for a (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New Train Sets #10013 and #10014
|
|
(...) (log flat) (...) Indeed. like this: (URL) their previous sets got it wrong too, I think... consider the car in 4565. (...) True. However LD is showing that they can expand their line nicely. Just as we hoped they would. I'll settle for that, (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New Train Sets #10013 and #10014
|
|
(...) Let me retract that... those slope the right way. ++Lar (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New Train Sets #10013 and #10014
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Christopher Masi writes: [snip] (...) Maybe they wish to try out the "new" marketing filosofy that this kind of sets may have more apeal to the general public, before they start flooding the shops with a similar type of product. (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New Train Sets #10013 and #10014
|
|
(...) philosophy Got ya there... Josh that this kind of (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New Train Sets #10013 and #10014
|
|
(...) Yep... you caught a non english speaker in a spelling mistake. So, how's your Dutch? :-) FUT off-topic.fun (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: New Train Sets #10013 and #10014
|
|
(...) I think so. Pandora's box has officially been opened:-) As for your analysis of the tank car, I think you are correct-- the ladder shouldn't penetrate the tank cylinder, but rather run up the outside of it. Connecting all of this is a part of (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: New Train Sets #10013 and #10014
|
|
(...) snip my (Chris's) critique of the new trains (...) snip more of my critique of the new trains (...) Hi John, I just wanted to make certain that every one knew that I brought you into this as a joke. I got the 8 stud wide comment in so you (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: New Train Sets #10013 and #10014
|
|
"Christopher Masi" <cmasi@cmasi.chem.tulane.edu> wrote in message (2) (...) isn't. (...) into (...) So, (...) Lego Direct or the larger corporate unit, either way it does not matter to me who markets the train line. I'm very pleased that someone at (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New Train Sets #10013 and #10014
|
|
(...) No, the other cars are not listed on the web site. We are assuming that they will be released, but LEGO has not released them. The sets were found by entering alternate numbers into the URL field. The speculation is that LEGO put these images (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New Train Sets #10013 and #10014
|
|
(...) Without trying to be a wet blanket (I *did* wait several days to point this out) TLC has pointed out in the past that they consider stuff that you cannot navigate to via things you can click on from a public starting point... they consider (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New Train Sets #10013 and #10014
|
|
(...) I wondered about repeating the links, but the files are in publicly accessible directories and the files are numbered consecutively. It is not like we are cracking into a private directory. LEGO is being naive if they think no one is going to (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
